Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,065,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 6.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Philippines influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Immigrants from Philippines simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants from Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants from Philippines Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 20.8% |
| Range | 66.5% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 6.6% |
| Median | 15.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 2.7% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Philippines Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 296,655,704 | 6.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 80,941,423 | 6.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 28,758,785 | 5.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 17,170,833 | 5.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 13,512,366 | 5.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 8,733,465 | 5.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,076,445 | 5.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 3,517,623 | 6.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 3,120,596 | 5.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,742,468 | 6.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 729,769 | 5.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 1,388,392 | 6.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 991,280 | 6.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 774,924 | 5.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 528,353 | 5.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 876,959 | 4.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 739,884 | 6.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.66% | 247,972 | 5.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 276,931 | 5.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,198 | 5.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 154,825 | 5.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 1,666 | 9.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 98,961 | 6.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 265,513 | 7.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 424,455 | 6.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.79% | 117,816 | 5.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.15% | 27,412 | 6.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 184,375 | 6.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 152,755 | 7.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.73% | 52,271 | 5.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.14% | 3,766 | 10.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 52,871 | 5.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 130,885 | 5.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.82% | 220 | 7.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 4,656 | 5.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.61% | 426 | 6.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.21% | 4,898 | 4.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.84% | 12,906 | 5.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.04% | 1,376 | 9.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 65,125 | 5.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.28% | 208,714 | 5.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.61% | 6,469 | 7.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.94% | 20,127 | 6.1% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 2,255 | 7.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.94% | 7,179 | 7.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.15% | 4,820 | 6.5% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.18% | 28,593 | 7.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 52,328 | 6.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 26,509 | 6.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.90% | 72,605 | 7.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.79% | 922 | 4.3% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 16,457 | 6.7% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 7,922 | 7.6% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.41% | 255 | 20.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.98% | 1,461 | 14.5% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.16% | 63 | 4.9% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.18% | 3,576 | 1.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.63% | 98 | 12.5% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.96% | 45,457 | 8.7% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.06% | 4,342 | 2.3% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.52% | 766 | 4.7% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.69% | 2,996 | 5.8% |