Immigrants from Philippines vs Ugandan Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Ugandan
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Ugandans
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Ugandan Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,154,961 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.17%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 26.8% | 26.2% |
| Range | 25.0% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 11.8% |
| Median | 10.8% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Ugandans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |