Immigrants from Philippines Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Philippines Family Households
68.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,023,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 68.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.32% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Philippines influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Philippines simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Native Hawaiian (68.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Central America (68.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Korean (68.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 69.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 69.3% |
| Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 69.3% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 69.1% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 69.0% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.8% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.4% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Immigrants from Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
Immigrants from Philippines Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 56.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.8% | 43.8% |
| Mean | 18.5% | 74.9% |
| Median | 15.9% | 73.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 69.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 79.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 9.2% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Philippines Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 296,574,460 | 63.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 80,943,269 | 65.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 28,778,638 | 68.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 17,181,005 | 70.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 13,514,848 | 66.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 8,733,445 | 67.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,074,244 | 69.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 3,517,550 | 69.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 3,123,273 | 71.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,742,619 | 68.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 729,927 | 72.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 1,389,285 | 72.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 992,525 | 72.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 774,924 | 71.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 529,914 | 74.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 876,959 | 72.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 739,884 | 66.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.66% | 247,972 | 74.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 276,931 | 77.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,409 | 69.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 154,825 | 79.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 1,666 | 57.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 98,961 | 83.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 265,513 | 70.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 424,455 | 74.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.79% | 117,644 | 72.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.15% | 27,412 | 71.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 184,375 | 74.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 152,755 | 76.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.73% | 52,271 | 83.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.14% | 3,766 | 63.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 52,871 | 78.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 130,885 | 80.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.82% | 220 | 85.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 4,748 | 61.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.61% | 426 | 91.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.22% | 4,628 | 88.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.83% | 13,347 | 71.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.07% | 1,500 | 72.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 65,125 | 72.7% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.28% | 208,714 | 74.8% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.61% | 6,531 | 77.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.94% | 20,127 | 81.6% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 2,255 | 73.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.94% | 7,179 | 80.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.15% | 4,820 | 66.2% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.18% | 28,783 | 75.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 52,328 | 79.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 26,509 | 76.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.90% | 72,605 | 77.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.79% | 922 | 73.9% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 16,457 | 86.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 7,994 | 76.3% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.41% | 255 | 100.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.98% | 1,461 | 73.6% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.16% | 63 | 70.0% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.18% | 3,576 | 58.5% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.73% | 375 | 85.1% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.96% | 45,457 | 78.7% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.06% | 4,342 | 56.2% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.10% | 84 | 100.0% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.69% | 2,996 | 90.1% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 22 | 100.0% |