Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Czechoslovakian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Czechoslovakians
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Czechoslovakian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,848,336 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,636,980 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 50.5% |
| Range | 24.0% | 49.6% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 10.8% |
| Median | 7.6% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Czechoslovakians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.030%), German (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Spaniard (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |