Kiowa vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
Latvian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
Latvians
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,003,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 70.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Latvian |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 26.5% |
| Range | 13.7% | 26.1% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 4.8% |
| Median | 7.1% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |