Alsatian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,623,919 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,586,734 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Alsatian	Immigrants from Northern Africa
Minimum	0.80%	3.3%
Maximum	16.9%	31.3%
Range	16.1%	28.0%
Mean	7.2%	11.4%
Median	7.6%	10.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.8%	7.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.2%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	6.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.9%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.8%	5.7%

Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Pennsylvania German (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (11.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Chilean (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Hungarian (11.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Chileans	86.2 /100 \| #142	Excellent 11.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	86.0 /100 \| #143	Excellent 11.0%
Syrians	85.5 /100 \| #144	Excellent 11.0%
Hungarians	85.1 /100 \| #145	Excellent 11.0%
Taiwanese	84.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 11.0%
Whites/Caucasians	83.9 /100 \| #147	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	83.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 11.1%
Brazilians	83.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 11.1%
Soviet Union	83.1 /100 \| #150	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Spain	81.7 /100 \| #151	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	81.7 /100 \| #152	Excellent 11.1%
Lebanese	81.6 /100 \| #153	Excellent 11.1%
Armenians	81.4 /100 \| #154	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	80.4 /100 \| #155	Excellent 11.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	75.6 /100 \| #156	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.2 /100 \| #157	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	72.6 /100 \| #158	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	70.4 /100 \| #159	Good 11.4%
French Canadians	69.5 /100 \| #160	Good 11.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.4 /100 \| #161	Good 11.4%
Alsatians	68.0 /100 \| #162	Good 11.4%