Shoshone vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Immigrants from El Salvador
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Immigrants from El Salvador
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,675,141 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 0.79%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.9% | 96.7% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 17.2% |
| Median | 16.6% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Immigrants from El Salvador by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |