Shoshone vs Sudanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Sudanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Sudanese
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Sudanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,113,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 43.0% |
| Range | 28.9% | 41.4% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 16.5% |
| Median | 16.6% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Sudanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |