Shoshone vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Immigrants from Middle Africa
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,623,141 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 26.2% |
| Range | 28.9% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 14.0% |
| Median | 16.6% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.49%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |