Blackfeet vs Australian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Australian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Blackfeet
Australians
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Australian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,450,114 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 31.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Australian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 72.4% | 78.1% |
| Range | 69.4% | 77.2% |
| Mean | 24.1% | 14.9% |
| Median | 19.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.4% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Yaqui (16.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zaire (16.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Latin America (16.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |