White/Caucasian vs Alaskan Athabascan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Alaskan Athabascan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Alaskan Athabascans
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
10.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Alaskan Athabascan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,250,955 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.713 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,796,895 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 4.5% | 15.1% |
| Range | 2.2% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 3.8% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.53% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.41% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.41% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Alaskan Athabascans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Immigrants from Thailand (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Scotch-Irish (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are French (2.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Central American (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (2.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
| Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |