Pima vs Tohono O'odham Currently Married
COMPARE
Pima
Tohono O'odham
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Pima
Tohono O'odham
35.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,552,342 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.741 and weighted average of 35.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,730,067 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357 and weighted average of 36.8%, a difference of 2.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 64.0% | 57.6% |
| Range | 57.8% | 51.4% |
| Mean | 36.3% | 32.0% |
| Median | 40.1% | 35.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.0% | 21.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.2% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.2% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Tohono O'odham by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (36.5%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 5.4%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 6.5%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and Navajo (39.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Hopi (36.5%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 4.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and Navajo (39.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 40.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.9% |