Pennsylvania German vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Osage
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Osage
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,555,284 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Osage |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 62.7% | 67.2% |
| Range | 58.4% | 60.5% |
| Mean | 20.9% | 21.1% |
| Median | 17.7% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
| German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |