Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,841,291 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 11.9 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $40,434, a difference of 19.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $51,594, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $52,450, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $38,833, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $57,580, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 70.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.92%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).