Chickasaw vs South African Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Chickasaw
South African
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Chickasaw
South Africans
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$50,044
PER CAPITA INCOME
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs South African Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,604,546 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of $50,044, a difference of 37.2%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | South African |
| Minimum | $10,758 | $17,364 |
| Maximum | $42,047 | $88,818 |
| Range | $31,289 | $71,454 |
| Mean | $28,009 | $49,855 |
| Median | $27,826 | $52,728 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $24,362 | $39,824 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $31,977 | $58,137 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $7,616 | $18,313 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $5,659 | $17,281 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $5,624 | $16,970 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Asian ($50,057, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe ($50,065, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($49,983, a difference of 0.12%), Bhutanese ($49,894, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Scotland ($49,893, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional $50,555 |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional $50,458 |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional $50,417 |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional $50,385 |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional $50,303 |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional $50,065 |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional $50,057 |
| South Africans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional $50,044 |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional $49,983 |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional $49,894 |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional $49,893 |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional $49,862 |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional $49,741 |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional $49,640 |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional $49,627 |