Chickasaw vs South African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 South African
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
South Africans
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs South African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,615 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 45.6%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | South African | 
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.31% | 
| Maximum | 21.2% | 27.3% | 
| Range | 18.8% | 27.0% | 
| Mean | 7.4% | 5.7% | 
| Median | 6.5% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 5.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 6.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 6.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 4.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 4.8%  | 
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187  | Fair 3.0%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188  | Fair 3.0%  | 
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189  | Fair 3.0%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198  | Fair 3.1%  | 
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201  | Poor 3.1%  |