Chickasaw vs South African Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,279,663 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.510 and weighted average of $65,652, a difference of 22.2%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from England ($65,715, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($65,497, a difference of 0.24%), Zimbabwean ($65,854, a difference of 0.31%), Egyptian ($65,441, a difference of 0.32%), and Marshallese ($65,874, a difference of 0.34%).