Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Alaskan Athabascan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Alaskan Athabascans
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,695,743 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 27.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 60.0% |
Range | 98.7% | 58.5% |
Mean | 8.7% | 14.7% |
Median | 5.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Senegalese (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.58%), Shoshone (6.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |