Lumbee vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Chickasaw
15.2%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,279,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 0.74%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 38.1% | 56.8% |
| Range | 35.8% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 18.5% | 22.9% |
| Median | 18.0% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Creek (15.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |