Chinese vs Central American Indian In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,143,757 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.545 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 2.0%.

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Northern European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%).

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Black/African American (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (63.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Osage (63.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Nonimmigrants (63.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scotch-Irish (63.3%, a difference of 0.17%).