Chinese vs Maltese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Maltese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Chinese
Maltese
64.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
13.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Maltese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,477,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.20%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Maltese |
| Minimum | 38.6% | 50.0% |
| Maximum | 72.9% | 81.0% |
| Range | 34.3% | 31.0% |
| Mean | 62.4% | 64.4% |
| Median | 63.3% | 64.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.5% | 61.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.9% | 67.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Maltese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Northern European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Alaskan Athabascan (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Belgian (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
| Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
| Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
| Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
| Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 8.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Croatians | 8.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Europeans | 8.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Poles | 8.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 8.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 64.7% |
| British | 7.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Chinese | 7.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 64.7% |