Burmese vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Burmese
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,070,150 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 3.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 18.9% | 11.9% |
| Range | 17.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.80% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Spain (2.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |