Celtic vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Celtics
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,857,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 29.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 11.9% |
| Range | 16.4% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 3.5% |
| Median | 4.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), German (3.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Scottish (3.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Pennsylvania German (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |