Czechoslovakian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,630,521 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 23.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 44.0% | 11.9% |
| Range | 41.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 3.5% |
| Median | 5.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Danish (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |