Immigrants from Cuba vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,940,819 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 4.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.47% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 6.5% | 11.9% |
Range | 6.1% | 10.6% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.5% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.88% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Armenia (2.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Colombian (2.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |