Immigrants from Switzerland vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Switzerland
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Switzerland
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
28.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,077,684 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 6.1%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Switzerland | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.89% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 11.9% |
Range | 19.3% | 10.6% |
Mean | 5.4% | 3.5% |
Median | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from South Africa (3.1%, a difference of 0.25%), African (3.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |