Jordanian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 11.9% |
| Range | 6.2% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |