Yup'ik vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Yup'ik
Sub-Saharan Africans
5.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,958,202 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 102.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 11.9% |
| Range | 14.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 3.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), Alaskan Athabascan (5.3%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 20.6%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 24.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |