Guyanese vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Guyanese
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Guyanese
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,815,788 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 26.1%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.72% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 4.4% | 11.9% |
Range | 3.7% | 10.6% |
Mean | 2.3% | 3.5% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Guyanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.4%, a difference of 3.3%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Vietnamese (2.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guyanese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |