Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Chile
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Chile
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,070,150 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,621,382 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.35%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 18.9% | 6.8% |
| Range | 17.8% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.80% | 0.83% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Chile by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Spain (2.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Guatemalan (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cypriot (2.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |