Hispanic or Latino vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hispanic or Latino vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 570,237,836 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 8.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hispanic or Latino | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 4.8% | 11.9% |
| Range | 3.2% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.46% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.46% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Hispanics or Latinos by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |