Iraqi vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Iraqi
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Iraqis
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
19.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,639,688 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 7.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iraqi | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 8.7% | 11.9% |
| Range | 7.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Iraqis by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Immigrants from North Macedonia (3.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (3.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Croatia (3.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |