Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Sub-Saharan Africans
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,388,222 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 45.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 11.9% |
| Range | 19.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 3.5% |
| Median | 6.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.94%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |