Immigrants from Belgium vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
41.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,709,031 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 4.8%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.12% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 11.9% |
Range | 18.9% | 10.6% |
Mean | 4.8% | 3.5% |
Median | 3.6% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Italy (3.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Bulgarian (3.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Ireland (3.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |