Immigrants from Morocco vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Morocco
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,904,383 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 4.4%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 5.2% | 11.9% |
Range | 4.0% | 10.6% |
Mean | 2.8% | 3.5% |
Median | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.79% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Belizean (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Somali (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Iranian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Iranians | 96.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Uruguayans | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |