Immigrants from Portugal vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Portugal
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Portugal
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Portugal vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,768,283 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 11.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Portugal | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 11.1% | 11.9% |
| Range | 10.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.3% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Portugal by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Portugal are Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |