Creek vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Creek
Sub-Saharan Africans
4.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,433,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 51.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 13.4% | 11.9% |
| Range | 11.8% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 3.5% |
| Median | 5.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |