Puerto Rican vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Puerto Rican
 Subsaharan African
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Puerto Ricans
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puerto Rican vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,769,112 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 22.6%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puerto Rican | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 14.8% | 11.9% | 
| Range | 13.5% | 10.6% | 
| Mean | 3.7% | 3.5% | 
| Median | 3.2% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Puerto Ricans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and European (3.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148  | Good 2.9%  |