Finnish vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Finnish
 Subsaharan African
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Finns
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,503,893 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 27.9%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Finnish | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 10.9% | 11.9% | 
| Range | 9.7% | 10.6% | 
| Mean | 4.9% | 3.5% | 
| Median | 4.6% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 2.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Finns by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 3.6%  | 
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148  | Good 2.9%  |