Okinawan vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Okinawan
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Okinawans
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,759,317 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Okinawan | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 7.3% | 11.9% |
| Range | 6.9% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Okinawans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Western Africa (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (2.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Pakistan (2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from China (2.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Haitians | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |