Immigrants from Iran vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,867,753 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 4.6%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.60% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 11.9% |
Range | 5.8% | 10.6% |
Mean | 2.7% | 3.5% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.83% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.82% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Somali (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Belizean (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Iranians | 96.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |