Burmese vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Burmese
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Burmese
Sub-Saharan Africans
48.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,297,934 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 48.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 14.9%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 24.6% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 93.9% | 84.5% |
| Range | 69.3% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 55.6% | 40.3% |
| Median | 53.2% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.0% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.7% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Welsh (48.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (49.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Croatian (48.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (48.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (48.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Welsh | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Irish | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |