Burmese vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Subsaharan African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Burmese
Sub-Saharan Africans
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,767,032 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 26.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 5.6% | 9.3% |
| Range | 5.4% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 1.6% | 2.6% |
| Median | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.7% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.43% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.68% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.67% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from China (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |