Ute vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ute
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,656,713 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 21.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 10.9% | 11.9% |
| Range | 9.3% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 3.5% |
| Median | 4.8% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Ute by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Spaniard (3.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Canadian (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Belgian (3.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |