Immigrants from England vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from England
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,804,752 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 16.1%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 37.3% | 11.9% |
Range | 35.7% | 10.6% |
Mean | 6.6% | 3.5% |
Median | 5.0% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Lithuanian (3.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Scotland (3.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Austrian (3.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (3.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (3.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | England | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
Yuman | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.4% |
Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |