Immigrants from Latin America vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,946,511 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.89% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 11.9% |
Range | 13.8% | 10.6% |
Mean | 2.9% | 3.5% |
Median | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.94% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Cambodian (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |