New Zealander vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Subsaharan African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Subsaharan African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 10.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 11.9% |
| Range | 13.6% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.8% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |