White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Brazilian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Brazilians
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,545,567 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.865 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,555,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Brazilian |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 14.2% |
Range | 10.8% | 13.0% |
Mean | 6.4% | 5.4% |
Median | 6.3% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Albanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |