Swedish vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Swedish
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Swedes
Luxembourgers
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 519,531,416 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 4.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 33.3% |
Range | 97.3% | 32.0% |
Mean | 23.7% | 11.9% |
Median | 13.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.6% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Russian (13.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Lithuanian (13.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Moldova (13.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.76%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |