Lumbee vs Choctaw Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Choctaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Choctaw
15.5%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Choctaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,289,178 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,676,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.84%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 41.7% | 35.6% |
| Range | 37.8% | 34.1% |
| Mean | 19.4% | 22.0% |
| Median | 17.5% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.8% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Choctaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Puerto Rican (16.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |